This is an archive of news stories and research from the National Union of Public and General Employees. Please see our new site - https://nupge.ca - for the most current information. 


Public-Private Partnerships in long-term care are the wrong move for the province

“P3s have been about private investors and companies dipping their hands in the public purse, at the expense of taxpayers." — Jerry Earle, NAPE President-elect 

St. John's (04 May 2015) — Jerry Earle, Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Public and Private Employees (NAPE/NUPGE) President-elect is expressing his fierce opposition to the government’s announcement that they will be moving to a public-private partnership (P3) model for long term care in the province.

Privatization of health care more costly 

“In no uncertain terms, this is an attack on the public health care system and on the public sector workers who provide this vital service to the people of the province,” said Earle. “This is another move by this government, championed by employer groups who stand to make huge profits from these agreements, towards a greater role for the private sector in the delivery of public services. Make no mistake, we will fight this privatization agenda.”

Public-private partnerships (P3s) involve commercial contracts between governments and private businesses in the design, construction, financing and operation of public infrastructure and services that have traditionally been delivered by the public sector, such as hospitals or schools.

In almost every example, governments across Canada and around the world claim that P3s are "innovative" and "more efficient," but the real world experience shows that the opposite is true. P3s are not a new and innovative idea; they have been around for decades. So, too, has their failure.

P3s more about increasing profits for investors than providing quality care

Research and real world experience in other jurisdictions highlights some serious flaws in how governments tally the benefits of public-private partnerships versus conventional public projects.

“You don’t have to look very far to see the failures of the P3 model. The Ontario Auditor General recently released a damning report about the P3 projects in that province, saying that the projects cost over $8 billion more than if they had been publicly financed and operated. A similar picture emerged in British Columbia, when the Auditor General there said that a P3 project was completed on time, but the final cost was 29 per cent ($28 million) higher. The list goes on and on,” said Earle. “P3s have been about private investors and companies dipping their hands in the public purse, at the expense of taxpayers. Essentially, taxpayers and future governments are left holding the bag for projects that this government can take credit for in the short term, all while businesses line their pockets.”

“We are calling on government to abandon this wasteful model and to commit to a quality, publicly funded, designed, and operated system of long-term care in this province,” stated Earle. “If they insist on moving forward with this ill-fated plan, we will have no choice but to do everything in our power to make them pay the political price.”

NUPGE

The National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) is one of Canada's largest labour organizations with over 340,000 members. Our mission is to improve the lives of working families and to build a stronger Canada by ensuring our common wealth is used for the common good. NUPGE